VoxCare: How key Democratic Senate candidates would tackle Covid-19

Today's coronavirus snapshot, as of 4 pm ET Monday: 6,020,186 confirmed US cases (25,325,617 worldwide) 183,355 confirmed US deaths (847,847 worldwide) 77,068,493 tests conducted in the US (234,251 tests per million people) —Dylan  . Cal Cunningham, the Democratic candidate in North Carolina's US Senate race, pointed out that the US is capable of coming together for the national good — just not, apparently, on Covid-19.   "If it had been a terrorist attack, there would have been an address to the nation, probably to a joint session of Congress. There would not have been a hesitation to invoke things like the Defense Production Act," Cunningham, a military veteran, told me in a phone interview. "There would have been clear communication from the top to every corner of America about how we fight that enemy. Here, we were told it was a hoax."   So I followed up: Why do you think this administration is treating the pandemic different from a terrorist attack?   He says that he has been "incredibly laser-focused on Senator Tillis and the role a senator should play in a moment like this" — one that he's found lacking.   Cunningham contrasted Tillis with Sen. Tom Cotton, a resolute conservative who still, to his credit, warned about the need to prepare for the worst after sitting in on a classified briefing in January about the Covid-19 threat.    "My guy, the person I hold accountable in this race, was not one of them," Cunningham argued to me. "He has demonstrated an unwillingness and an inability to ask the tough questions when a US senator, in a coequal branch of government, should be doing exactly that."   With a deftness that reminded me of Joe Biden's convention speech, when the Democratic nominee never once named his opponent while still panning his record, Cunningham made clear the problems with President Trump's approach to the pandemic — nobody else in a position of power was calling the coronavirus a "hoax" or hesitated to invoke the DPA — and yet when given the chance, he elided any more direct criticisms of Trump and instead stayed "laser-focused" on his own Republican opponent.   Cunningham's critique overall — directed at the federal government broadly and Tillis specifically, with glancing blows to the man in the White House — was represented in his explanation of how his military experience had informed his own beliefs about crisis response:   "It requires the whole of government, led by an administration and a federal government that deploys all available resources. It is hard for us to come to any conclusion other than the federal government has dropped the ball with respect to some of the most basic building blocks of, first, containing the virus and containing the impacts of it."   So I was curious: How are other Democratic hopefuls running against Republican incumbents in key swing states talking about Covid-19 and Trump? As it turns out, several of them sound a lot like Cunningham.   Take this ad from Theresa Greenfield, running against Sen. Joni Ernst in Iowa. She starts off by saying the Covid-19 pandemic had revealed "the worst in Washington" before transitioning into a populist critique portraying the original GOP Senate coronavirus relief package as a slush fund for corporate America (the same words used by Senate Democrats at the time, Politico reported).     Neither Donald Trump's visage nor his name appears.   A new ad from Jon Ossoff, the Democrat challenging Sen. David Perdue in Georgia, likewise eschews any direct attack on Trump while still making his meaning perfectly clear. Ossoff says straight to the camera, after reminding viewers his wife who works at a hospital tested positive for Covid-19, that we need to listen to medical experts, we need a national testing strategy, and "we" need to stop politicizing masks.   Sara Gideon, running against Sen. Susan Collins in Maine, wrote a whole op-ed in the Portland Press Herald lamenting the shortcomings of "Washington's COVID response." The Trump administration doesn't get mentioned until one of the last paragraphs, lumped together with Washington Republicans who "have focused on winning partisan fights and allowing the wealthy and well-connected to skip to the front of the line."   Some of this is tried-and-true strategy for challenging an incumbent: associate them with "Washington" (a place nobody but the people who live here seems to like) and the status quo.   Some of it is triangulation on the part of Democrats running in states Trump won: The president's approval rating in North Carolina is hovering around 45 percent; it's about the same in Georgia and Iowa, per the most recent polling.   That's not great, but it's better than the national average. In all three of those states, the incumbents are running a few points behind Trump in the Real Clear Politics polling average, indicating there is some number of voters who are locked in for Trump but not as sold on their Republican senator. That is good reason to be less direct in critiquing the president and more focused on your actual opponent if you're the Democratic challenger.   But I think there is one other way to understand the Democratic approach to Trump and Covid-19 in these Senate races. Trump's failures, documented so well by my colleague German Lopez, are plain for all to see. There is no need to belabor the point because the public's approval of Trump's Covid-19 response is already disastrously low. When you talk about not bringing the full power of the federal government to bear or politicizing masks, people know who it is you mean.   The goal, then, seems to be making sure these Republican senators own that failure, too. CHART OF THE DAY German Lopez/Vox Just 5 states meet these basic criteria to reopen and stay safe. An update in this essential series from Vox's German Lopez: States should meet at least five basic criteria. They should see a two-week drop in coronavirus cases, indicating that the virus is actually abating. They should have fewer than four daily new cases per 100,000 people per day — to show that cases aren't just dropping but are also below dangerous levels. They need at least 150 new tests per 100,000 people per day, letting them quickly track and contain outbreaks. They need an overall positive rate for tests below 5 percent — another critical indicator for testing capacity. And states should have at least 40 percent of their ICU beds free to actually treat an influx of people stricken with Covid-19 should it be necessary. These metrics line up with a range of expert recommendations, as well as the various policy plans put out by both independent groups and government officials to deal with the coronavirus. So far, most states are not there. Just five states — Connecticut, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont — met four or five of the goals, which demonstrates strong progress. Twenty-three states and Washington, DC, hit two or three of the benchmarks. The remaining 19 achieved zero or one. (Colorado, South Carolina, and Washington state are excluded due to recent errors in test reporting.) Facebook Twitter YouTube This email was sent to majed2aboshddad.majed@blogger.com. Manage your email preferences, or unsubscribe to stop receiving all emails from Vox. If you value Vox's unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring contribution. View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved.